Performing for babies – a workshop

The Scalattine Teatro: SCATénàTi Unleashed

Anna Fascendini, creator and director of SCATéNàTI Unleashed, researcher of theatre for young children lead a 2-day workshop for actors in Madhouse

Recreating the social action of Children

In the workshop there was spaghetti, coarse salt, tree branches, feathers and chains (we’ll hear more of the chains in a minute). We played with the materials, creating narratives, both individually and in pairs. As there was multiple of one material it was best not do much mixing.The idea was to treat the materials like people, interact with them as if they could talk back.


The important part for me was to learn to  present interaction with accessible materials that are environmental, as well as practice non-verbal communication and spatial awareness exercises.

I went to see the performance later. It  was in two parts – watching the actors interact with the material, dance, communicate, then, through presenting the material to every child in the audience, kids are invited to play.



A part of the works is to make kids understand some spaces that they cannot enter and create boundaries.  For example, to have tape on the floor indicating where there is space for the performance and space for the audience. After the watching part is over, you need to take away the borders, showing that they can now enter the stage. Time and space before and after the show, is carefully planned. The performance has no clear ending to make it stand out, to get into it.The role and actions of the parents are very important factors, as they are the ones controlling the children.

The plays are designed for kids between age of a couple of months and 5 years.The youngest member of the audience on Friday was 6 days old.


Delai Sammit

The fourth informal urban initiatives conference Delai Sammit took place at the ZIL Cultural center in Moscow on April 19-20.
The Delai Sammit / DIY Conference is the embodiment of practical philosophy of personal involvement and collective action with the idea of changing oneselves, one´s society and cities. The conference provides space for learning and interaction among people who are not indifferent to their cities. The Delai Sammit focuses on the most interesting and effective cases of civil actions and initiatives aimed at creating a friendlier urban space. (

Delai sammit
I was due to go to Moscow anyway and, after hearing about this event from I suggested help with the running of the event. I wanted to be involved and get to know people. I wanted to go home and do something, something other than stuffing my face with sushi and stocking up on buckwheat.
My role turned out to be awkwardly announcing the speakers, keeping the time by discreetly waving A4 sheets of paper with the minutes left and running after the lovely sound technicians when the mic ran out of batteries. The job was tiring and a bit stressful as I was very conscious of my Russian with an Irish accent (last time I had to come on stage and make sense through the Russian language had been over 10 years ago).
Initiated by the civil initiatives Community Project, Partizaning Project, Moscow Youth Multifunction Center, Guerilla Gardening Movement, Greenhouse of Social Technologies Project and opened by Darya Melissina and Tatyana Kargina, the festival had four strands: Urbanism, Street Art, Self-Organization and Advocacy.
The Sammit was launched with lectures and discussions on April 19. The Green Room, where I volunteered, presented the speakers:

Daniel Latorre (USA) — expert of Project for public space (PPS), ideologist of the Digital placemaking concept that has been used to develop and implement online tools for changing urban space by the citizens. Daniel spoke of the importance of public spaces in the lives of the citizens both as physical entities and symbols. He discussed the Gutenberg parenthesises and the invention of printing press as the start of nations and control. He presented social media and map making for understanding and communicating social movements. Some examples of post-digital networking techniques that he discussed included taxi drivers as agents for revolution in the East. His lecture was followed by a workshop that took place on Sunday.

Alain Bieber, art critic, curator and author of, one of the most influential street art and art activism blogs, and books Art Agenda and Urban Interventions.
Margarita Augustin, specialist in Art History, researcher at the Department of Art History at the University of Freiburg (Germany). A great text my Margarita is here (in Russian).

Sasha Kurmaz, street artist and photographer from Kiev. He showed photographs from Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kiev, the place or the protests, barricades and fights. Through his photography he captured the ways that people coped with the long-term living on the street. He was amazing.

Sasha Kurmaz, Kiev 2014.
Sasha Kurmaz, Kiev 2014.

Vladimir Turner (Czech Republic), urban interventionist who combines documentary techniques, urban art and activism in his works. He spoke of the gallery as a graveyard of street art, stating that an exhibition by recently deceased Pasha 183 in Moscow Museum of Modern Art is taken out of context in MOMMA and looks like an “MTV skate shop decoration”. “The gallery isn’t the street the street is the gallery”. Dejecting any kind of commercial art, he spoke of ethical choices we make when agreeing to exhibit or sell out art.
Other talks were presented by Transparency Russia, Greenpeace, and Richard Reynolds of Guerrilla Gardening Raimonds Elbakjans, director of the youth street culture and sports movement Ghetto Games to name a few.
Speakers from Ukraine were most certainly the ones I found the most exciting, challenging and inspiring. Activist and artist Alexandr Wolodarskij spoke about volunteer medical help in Kiev during the protests. He really was unreal. I bought his book. There was a stall by Radical Theory and Practice independent publisher, presenting translated anarchist writings, as well as books by Russian, Ukrainian and Belorussian artists and activist.

Алксандра Сапыгина1

Sunday, April 20th was a working day.
World art activism fair under the curatorship of Alan Bieber, focused on privacy and surveillance. Hairstyles to cheat face recognition devices and mobile phone cases that insure privacy were some of the highlights of the fair. There was a fashion show at the end that presented all the work made throughout the weekend.

Daniel Latorre conducted a Hackathon, a marathon of developing new useful web services and mobile applications for active citizenship. The task was to develop a concept for a self-organised place for meetings, art shows, exchange of knowledge and skills.

I participated in the discussion on activism, where we talked about the structure of the place. We decided on the format of an apartment, with kitchen to host cooking lessons, lunches, and philosophical discussions. The sitting room was dedicated to art and performance, the nursery – for kids activities, the study – for workshops and presentations, the garage -for cycling enthusiasts, library for books and the balcony/yard – for gardening and outdoor games, etc..

Daniel suggested some practical techniques for testing the concept – for example calling a friend and explaining the idea and the title and seeing if they understand it, or approaching a person in a park and chatting to them about the idea.

Сапыгина а

The organization was great, bar the strange location in the building (we practically sat on a stairwell) and hence terrible acoustics.
I went because I wanted to meet the people who live, work and make in the country where there is no democracy. I wanted to gain faith and I did. I met some amazing people. There was no talk about politics. No complains about the lack of funding or the bureaucracy. People just got together and got on with it.
I wanted to be somewhat useful. I don’t know if I was actually any good, but hey I kept the place going for a day, even if my oratorical skills are not the best.
Everyone was really lovely though, even the presenters whose names I got wrong, or the projector stopped working on them, or the presentation got delay – the usual perks. Tanya and Dasha, the organizers, were great and mostly left me to my own devices. There was no break at all, but the lentil cutlets and vegan carrot cake from EkaLoka kept me going.
Overall, I loved it. Definitely learnt a lot.


Photography: Anastasia Artemeva and Aleksandra Sapygina

PlaceMaking Workshop

Helsinki 2012

“It’s hard to design a space that will not attract people. What is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.”

– William (Holly) Whyte

Today I attended a Placemaking workshop organized by Aalto University in collaboration with Helsinki Design week .  The workshop was lead by Elena Madison, vice president of Projects for Public Spaces, New York, “a nonprofit planning, design and educational organization dedicated to helping people create and sustain public spaces that build stronger communities”.

The idea of the workshop was to evaluate and suggest improvements to the waterfront site in Helsinki district of katajanokka, a proposed site for Helsinki Guggenheim museum. Currently it a barren space with the seafront sectioned off by a fence as it is a customs zone for the nearby Stockholm ferries. The workshop was held in the old The Old Customs Warehouse, or Tulli- ja Pakkahuone in Finnish, a stunning turn of the century building, which is now used as a design hub and an exhibition space.

Old Customs house Helsinki

In the morning the four participants including students from curatiorial studies, design management, interior design and myself attended a presentation by Elena Madison:

She spoke of a public space as a starting point rather than an afterthought. She mentioned William H. Whyte, the mentor of PPS, who is an author of books such as The Organization Man,  1956, where he critiques surbanisation, The Exploding Metropolis, The Last Landscape, and The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, a social study of public spaces. His research activities included behaviour mapping, time lapse, he promoted holistic view and observation.

 One of the best things about water is the look and feel of it. It’s not right to put water before them and then keep them away from it… Benches are artifacts, the purpose of which is to punctuate architectural photographs. They are not so good for sitting.

In the afternoon we went to evaluate the site using the same evaluation form that is normally given t the members of the community in question. On the first page of the form, called Place Game, was an evaluation table, where we had to rate the place in its existing format, to rank it on comfort and image, access & linkages, uses & activities as well as its sociability. On the second page were questions like “List at least ten activities you would like to be able to do in this place?” “who else should be attracted to use this space (teens, mothers, seniors, artists, etc)?” and others concerning what we would do with the space.  Then we made suggestions and drew a plan for the site.  Image by Santo Leung

The plan will probably  not be realised, but hopefully it will help the architects to create a better environment in the area sometime in the future.

Below is a beautiful visualisation by one of the participants, Sini Parikka. Please see armi website for a report by Sini.

Many thanks to Elena, all the organisers and participants, and Santo Leung for the photo.


Foraging and Urban Gardening


So here I am in Aalto university in Helsinki. Our first workshop lead by Joel Rosenberg was called Foraging and Urban gardening. We cycled a lot. About 30 km a day.  I mean for me it really was a lot, but the Finns didn’t seem to mind.


On the first two days we went around Helsinki and collected fruit and berries from public gardens. There is an “everyman’s right” in Finland, so everybody is allowed to forage for food in public as well as private spaces (as long as they are reasonable away from the private residential property).



We also went to the Pasila railway garden organised by a local environmental and urban gardening organisation Dodo. There is a glass house placed on the former railway turntable, several outdoors allotments, and a restaurant serving food just grown. The fantastic place is located right in the city centre of Helsinki, on a wasteland on the side of the railway and it is just  magical to see the garden transforming the space so much.



On Wednesday we went to Nuuksio National park about half an hour from Helsinki. We learned about mushrooms and made a Shamrock and mushroom soup.




On Friday we each had to present our own projects (more about the projects here)

My work was centred around an apple tree, tucked away by the former gate of Helsinki prison. Immediately I was compelled by the parallel of the apples rotting on the ground and the people wasting their time away in the prison. In attempt to highlight this process, I brought a pack of bleached A4 office paper, normally used for documents, the likes of birth certs and life-sentences.

I carefully placed the gone off apples on the blank pages, one on each own sheet. I didn’t pick every single one, just a few, as I was getting a bit nervous because of a gentleman sitting down on the bench nearby and staring at me. He wouldn’t leave until I had picked all the sheets up.Through this semi-experimental and experiential work I was curious to see what imprint an apple would leave on the white sheet.


The next day I brought the group of fellow students with me to the site, wishing for them to experience the work in a participatory way. With me I had a second hand book, Охрана окружающей среды, environmental protection in English (Google translate says it’s ympäristönsuojelu in Finnish, I love the way it’s one word rather than two or three). I invited everyone to tear the pages out of the book and, again, place them under the fallen apples, see how many wasted apples we can find.

5image by Joel Rosenberg 7

Team work was much more fruitful than my own attempt, and we used up the whole book of 559 pages.

It was a good week!